Today I started sorting through my slides, grouping them into their original collections and trying to make sense of how I might organise my archive. A lot of the private (amateur / vernacular) slides are already numbered, either by hand or stamped by a machine, and nearly all of the commercial slides have very considered catalogue numbers. I have started by simply grouping the slides by the information that appears on their frames – most of them can be easily identifiable by their colour, typography (or hand writing), placement of information and in some cases the processing company’s name. If none of these give any clues, then the content of the photograph itself can sometimes help – photographs by the same photographer often have a similar feel to them; I have one group, for example, where no information is written on them, but they are all slightly underexposed, and all come in the same blue plastic frames.
The two columns on the left are all amateur slides, the rest are commercial slides. You can tell by the amount of printed matter on the frames:

Below is my small collection of Pana-Vue slides. I’ve found it difficult to find any information about the company, but from what I gather Pana-Vue were one of the biggest producers of commercial slides in the 1970s, mass producing slides of American attractions and nature reserves. Their alpha-numeric catalogue numbers alone (which are complicated and difficult to decipher) would suggest they produced many thousands of individual images.


To get an idea of just how many they (may) have produced, visit DisneyPix, which has an incomplete collection of 420 slides of Disney World. I have a handful of these in my collection along with those of other locations such as Michigan, Canada, Hawaii, and San Francisco – if you consider there over 420 Disney World slides, imagine how many there are including all the other locations they photographed.

















